Re: How simple is the simple in KISS

["Jenkins Gordon" <gjenkins@singnet.com.sg>]

David

Are not Items 1 and 2 the same - or close to the same?

Regards

Gord

Gordon Jenkins
Standard Chartered Bank C&IB
Senior Product Manager: Electronic Commerce
51 Bras Basah
SINGAPORE 189554

Email : gjenkins@singnet.com.sg

Tel :65-331 5095
----- Original Message -----
From: David Burdett <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail) <ebXML-Transport@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 1:53 PM
Subject: How simple is the simple in KISS


> There has been a lot of recent discussion about KISS on the list that I
> whole-heartedly support.
>
> However we must NOT make it so simple that it does not meet minimum
> requirements. So, for what it's worth, here are my **minimum**
requirements
> for ebXML Transport. We need to develop specifications for:
>
> 1. Message Headers. The additional data that must be associated with a
> document so that it can be sent a third party and successfully processed -
> we're working on this
> 2. Reliable Messaging. If for some reason, a message does not get through
to
> it's destination, then we can identify the problem and recover from it in
a
> way that does not rely on proprietary reliable messaging protocols.
> 3. Security. We need to know that a message has not changed and is
> authentic, i.e. it has come from the organization or individual it appears
> to have come from
>
> I know that requirements 2 and 3 are not **always** required, but I think
> that in B2B they will be so frequently required that we will not be get
> widespread adoption of ebXML Transport without them.
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> David
>
> Advanced Technology, CommerceOne
> 4400 Rosewood Drive 3rd Fl, Bldg 4, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
> Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 or +1 (650) 623 2888;
> mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
>