[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Concern with basic ebXML TRP Syntax/Semantics
Message text written by Christopher Ferris > Our intent has been, and continues to be, to submit our reqirements to W3C or whichever body chooses to engage in the specification of an XML packaging solution, which IMHO is clearly needed. We felt that it was inapproprate for us (TR&P WG) to define the specification ourselves. <<<<<<<<<<<< Chris', May I suggest that it would be appropriate for you to post a technical note to the W3C site, and also cross-post this to the ebXML technical assessment group (we're just gearing up to fill this void for people - so I'll let you know when the new listserve is up here). I hate to see good ideas going astray when with some modicum of effort we can catch these and move them forward. It's not a huge effort to at least define a draft document, the goal, rough approach and so forth to act as a catalyst. Also - I believe strongly in the role of ebXML to facilitate interoperability with XML, so we should be a conduit for these peices between the proper other authorities. Thanks, DW.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC