Re: Manifest inclusion issue

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

Just so that I'm on the same page. A <null> payload is *explicitly* denoted 
by the absence of  Manifest details - the Manifest itself is present. Agreed ?

Nick

At 04:57 PM 4/13/2000 -0400, Nikola Stojanovic wrote:
><David>
>I think that, in both examples, option 2 is the better XML style.
></David>
>
>I agree (not only XML style). In 2. we have consistent relationship by value
>and in 1. we have relationship by value/existence (where existence is an
>exception). If I recall correctly, this is in line with Ian's, Chris's and
>others' feelings about mandatory manifest. This might be a design rule for
>the whole ebXML?
>
>Nikola
>
>
>
>
>