[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Glossary?
A good idea ! David -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 11:31 AM To: ebXML-Transport@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Glossary? All, Seeing the definitions section in David's doc, and the Glossary in Dick's packaging spec leads me to suggest that we might want to consider a separate glossary/definitions document so that there is one and only one definition for any given term and we don't end up with inconsistencies (either at the start, or as the documents are evolved). In fact, it might be wise to have the Technical Coordination WG edit/produce the document, taking input from the other WGs. That way, there isn't conflict between WGs (which might not be caught). Just a thought, Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC