RE: ebXML Proof of Concept Proposal v0.5

[Marc Breissinger <marcb@webmethods.com>]

I will alter the POC document to reflect this decision from the f2f.  I do
have a question however: does using "Content-Type: application/vnd.eb+xml"
to identify the header part prohibit the possibility of embedding a fully
enveloped eb-xml message as a payload part as it would also have the
"Content-Type: application/vnd.eb+xml"?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 10:40 PM
> To: Ebxml; ebXML POC Mailing List; marcb@webmethods.com
> Subject: RE: ebXML Proof of Concept Proposal v0.5
>
>
>
> Section "ebXML Technical Details", subsection "Packaging" of the  POC
> proposal states:
>
> "It should be noted that there is a significant problem with the current
> draft of the packaging standard that effectively prevents the receiving
> application from recognizing the header part.  The RFC for generating MIME
> Content-ID mandates only that they be unique strings.  Therefore, the
> receiving application cannot depend on the presence of the
> “ebxmlheader” and
> “ebxmlpayload” tokens preceding the unique id to identify the header vs.
> payload parts.  In order to resolve this issue in the demonstration
> environment, participants must include the “Start:” directive shown in the
> example above."
>
> I believe this section of the POC is incorrect.
>
> During the July 21-22 face-to-face meeting the ebXML TR&P team decided to
> eliminate the dependency on Content-ID to identify a ebXML header
> body part
> within a ebXML message and created a MIME media type,
> "application/vnd.eb+xml", to identify ebXML header documents. This MIME
> media type unambiguously identifies THE body part containing the ebXML
> header document.  One simply needs to locate the body part identified with
> the MIME header "Content-type: application/vnd.eb+xml" to locate the ebXML
> header document.
>
> I recommend that POC participants consider using the
> application/vnd.eb+xml
> content type to identify the ebXML header document instead of the proposed
> "Start:" extension header, which is non-standard.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dick Brooks
> http://www.8760.com/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Breissinger [mailto:marcb@webmethods.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 5:25 PM
> To: ebXML POC Mailing List
> Subject: ebXML Proof of Concept Proposal v0.5
>
>
> All,
>
> Attached is latest rev of the POC proposal.  Please read through
> and respond
> with comments.  I will complete the TPA section tomorrow.
>
> Sorry for the delay,
> marc
>
> ==========================================================================
> Marc Breissinger                                   voice (W): 703-460-2504
> Director, Product Strategy - webMethods, Inc.      voice (C): 703-989-7689
> Email:  marcb@webmethods.com                               We're hiring!!!
> Email2: breissim@earthlink.net              URL: http://www.webmethods.com
> ==========================================================================
>
>
>
>
>