[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: CNET.com - News - Enterprise Computing - Microsoft,IBM set asiderivalry to cr
Dick, I have looked at the SOAP 1.1 spec and have implemented a parser for it. The specification is so broad except for the specification of data types. I believe it would be trivial to put the ebXML headers in the SOAP header and the payload in a SOAP body. The only thing this would really require would be to define two namespaces, one for the ebXML headers and one by the application for its payload and then use the SOAP wrapper instead of MIME. A simple specification document like the MIME wrapper spec should take care of the whole argument. Then we would have "ebXML over SOAP". I know this would not meet some of the ebXML requirements (mostly that the headers and payload are separate documents). But it would clarify the purpose of SOAP and our position in regards to SOAP. What do you think? Jim McCarthy WebXi, Inc. http://www.webxi.com -----Original Message----- From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 6:45 PM To: Ebxml Subject: CNET.com - News - Enterprise Computing - Microsoft,IBM set aside rivalry to cr FYI.... I've had more than one person ask me if the Sun/IBM disagreement would affect ebXML's chances... This press release isn't helping matters. Dick
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC