re: Trading Partner Logical Identification based on EDIFACT or X12qualifiers

[Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>]

Hi,

I wouldn't suggest using ISO 6523 as it has a very limited 
identifier space.  

I'm not familiar with X12 of EDIFACT's identifier schemes 
but they are undoubtedly better than 6523.  If you want 
something from ISO/ITU-T, look at ISO/IEC 9834-7.

Henry
---------------------------------------
At 10:24 AM 08/14/2000 -0400, David RR Webber wrote:
>Message text written by "William J. Kammerer"
>> The codes should just reuse those
>available from EDIFACT, X12 or ISO 6523, rather than inventing new ones
>like "DUNS". For example,
>
>    <To>
>        <PartyId context="ISO 9735" authority="1">003897733</PartyId>
>    </To><
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>Dick,
>
>This makes total sense - can you discuss it at your next conference
>call and make a decision?
>
>Incidently I'm adding the igML definitions to the GUIDE <extensions> so
>those EDI formats will be available there to for referencing.
>
>This means if you look up the GUIDE reference for PartyId you would
>get all the information William is showing above as definition and
>related definitions.
>
>Thanks, DW.