[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Trading Partner or Party - What's in a name
> Would this mean that Trading Partner Agreement XML should be changed into > Trading Party Agreement XML? I think this depends on why you are using a "Trading Partner Agreement." If there is a special reason, then I would stick with "Trading Partner Agreement" because, whether the name is weird or not, that is the term of art used by lawyers for this special type of agreement/contract. If there is no special reason for using a Trading Partner Agreement, other than you picked up an EDI spec and thought, wow, here are some good pieces of data and some business rules, let's turn it into XML, then I think a completely different name would be more appropriate and less confusing (perhaps . . . "Electronic Contract XML." This also might allow you to create something more generic (which, by the way, is one of the things that the Legal XML CONTRACT WG is interested in doing), if that's what you want to do. I should know this, but is there a requirements document somewhere that I can read? Thanks, Todd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC