TPAs in a multi-hop environment

[David Burdett <david.burdett@commerceone.com>]

Marty

I agree with Marty and extend it to also include an agreement between the
original sender and the final recipient.

David



-----Original Message-----
From: mwsachs@us.ibm.com [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 5:16 AM
To: Henry Lowe
Cc: richard drummond; ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: Re: discussion priorities


One possibility for multihop is that the sending Party only cares about the
first path, which can be configured in a TPA.  For the remaing paths,
perhaps only the intermediate nodes care about the patha they send it on.

Regards,
Marty

****************************************************************************
*********

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
****************************************************************************
*********



Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org> on 08/22/2000 05:28:05 PM

To:   richard drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>
cc:   "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>
Subject:  Re: discussion priorities



All,

I didn't see anything in the Messaging saying how routing is
handled.  One of the things we've talked about since the
beginning is multi-hop routing, e.g., customer at A orders
widget W from vendor at V bu the message goes via a portal P
which means it travers two links (one of which might be HTTP
and the other MQSeries or CORBA).

I included this in my comments, but didn't propvide text.
You would probably use source routing for this sort of thing
where the route(s) would be contained in the TPA.  But some
how these have to get into the Header of the Message so A
knows to send the message to P and P knows to send it on to V.
Also need to have a place in the headers to record it's
actual wild and wooly route through the Internet for traceability.

Or is this all there and I just missed it?

Best regards,
Henry
---------------------------------------------
At 07:37 PM 08/21/2000 -0500, richard drummond wrote:
>I wish to vote on releasing the messaging spec to the wider ebXML audience
>this Thursday. given that we will incorporate "error handling" and the
>"party/address" codes in the spec during the comment period... does anyone
>think we can not pass the messaging spec this Thursday?
>
>best regards, Rik
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Burdett [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
>Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 7:17 PM
>To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
>Subject: TRP Error Handling Spec Draft
>
>
>Folks
>
>I attach some light reading for the weekend. Alternatively called, the TRP
>Error Handling draft spec version 01 ;)
>
>David
> <<ebXML TRP Error Handling draft 01.doc>>  <<ebXML TRP Error Handling
draft
>01.pdf>>
>
>Product Management, CommerceOne
>4400 Rosewood Drive 3rd Fl, Bldg 4, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
>Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599
>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
>
>