RE: Standards Comparison

[richard drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

we compared standards back 6 months ago to get the headers defined.
rosettanet is monitoring the effort and believe what we are doing could
possible replace in a later phase their current transport specifications.
dick b. and i monitor it for as1 an as2. dick b. and ralph b. monitor soap.
dick, david and others are watching biztalk frame work v2... so i think we
are fine at this time. so don't change anything. for right now..... lets
just get the priorities out which are the messaging spec and then the
security and the rm drafts specs... rik

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hughes [mailto:jfh@fs.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 3:25 AM
To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Standards Comparison


Can you please suggest start/stop dates and how the activity relates to
other activities in the plan? (I presume this activity results in some
report, so someone -- you? -- would be the editor?)

I'd be happy to add it with the right details...

Jim

At 01:19 PM 8/28/2000 -0700, David Burdett wrote:
>Jim
>
>I don't see the activity to compare our specs against other standards (e.g.
>RosettaNet) in your new plan. I've asked a number of times and Chris Ferris
>also thought it would be a good idea. As  "the keeper of the plans" what do
>you suggest as a process for getting new activities incorporated in to our
>plans? Because, whatever it is, I want to follow it !!
>
>David
>PS I am really glad though that someone is keeping a plan as without it we
>will never know when we're finished
>PPS Deleted your name from the "To" as requested