document due date....FW: facilitation of TRP MHS spec by QR

[Rik Drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 10:24 PM
To: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au
Cc: Rik Drummond; Ebxml-Stc; 'ebXML Coordination'
Subject: Re: facilitation of TRP MHS spec by QR


Tim,

Please see below.

Cheers,

Chris

Tim McGrath wrote:
>
> The QR Team accept your suggestion that if we receive the document on
Monday
> 16th we shall reply by 18:00 PST on Thursday 19th.
>
> PS
> I am unclear about your comment -
>
> a. will this document now encompass errors, reliable messaging and
security?

yes. We had been working separate documents for errors and RM. What was
deemed
suitable for phase I was incorporated. Security is addressed but only to a
very
minor extent (ability to encrypt payload). Security is a phase II
deliverable
but we felt it necessary to say something at this stage;-)

>
> b. is there a formal change log of modifications made since the previous
> version?

Yes, but it may be difficult to track the individual comments/changes
because of the
reformatting to conform to the IETF format. However, all changes other
than style edits have been addressed in the comment/change log. Doing a diff
from v0.21 to the version we release next week will be futile because of
the restructuring.

>
> Rik Drummond wrote:
>
> > the new trp document has been reformatted into the ebXML format, three
> > people have submitted sections on errors, reliable messaging and
security
> > during this round of comments. everything else is the same except for
two
> > other technical comments... Rik
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim McGrath [mailto:timcgra@attglobal.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:58 PM
> > To: Rik Drummond
> > Cc: Ebxml-Stc; 'ebXML Coordination'
> > Subject: Re: facilitation of TRP MHS spec by QR
> >
> > All Team Leaders should be aware that it appears several deliverables
may be
> > submitted for QR over the upcoming weeks.  To date we have worked on a
> > first-come, first-serve basis.
> >
> > However, there are some differences with the TRP MS spec:
> > a. it is on its second review.
> > we would expect this not to take the full 5 days allocated.  our
intention
> > for
> > the second review is to focus on the change log - so this is an
important
> > part
> > of your submission.
> >
> > b. it is the only document likely to be voted in the plenary.
> >
> > Under these circumstances i will put it on the agenda at our
teleconference
> > this Thursday and i shall propose we endorse what you suggest.
> >
> > I will report back to you on this.
> >
> > Rik Drummond wrote:
> >
> > > We are very short on time to get the spec voted on at Tokyo. We could
have
> > > it to you by next Monday. Our review period for the second review is
> > > finished today.
> > >
> > > As far as I know this is the only spec going to vote at Tokyo...
because
> > of
> > > that I suggest we bump it to the front of the line. It is my
understanding
> > > that other spec's qr is reviewing are not going to vote and they are
> > merely
> > > reviewing them as courtesy review and are not the formal review
necessary
> > > for the ebXML spec release process. If I get the spec to you next
Monday,
> > > may I expect it back with comments on eob Thursday?
> > >
> > > thanks for the help.... Rik
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > tim mcgrath
> > TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> > phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
>
> --
> regards
> tim mcgrath
> TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

--
    _/_/_/_/ _/    _/ _/    _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect
   _/       _/    _/ _/_/  _/  Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063
  _/_/_/_/ _/    _/ _/ _/ _/   Email: chris.ferris@East.Sun.COM
       _/ _/    _/ _/  _/_/    Sun Microsystems,  Mailstop: UBUR03-313
_/_/_/_/  _/_/_/  _/    _/     1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903