ebxml-transport message

Subject: Re: Ack Message Payload??

From: David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>
To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>,ebxml transport <ebXML-Transport@lists.ebxml.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:46:20 -0500

Message text written by Christopher Ferris
>
Regardless, I think that a BP-level ACK *should* have
a payload, even if it is a minimal one like:
        <status>OK</status>

It SHALL have a MessageType="Normal" and it SHALL have
a ServiceInterface and Action appropriate to its purpose
at least for the current state of affairs.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Chris,

Agreed.   Getting back an empty transaction is too ambiguous.

DW.