[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: FW: Proposed Revisions to MS ver 0.8
> -----Original Message----- > From: aeisenbe [mailto:aeisenbe@progress.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:49 PM > To: Transport Work Group > Subject: RE: Proposed Revisions to MS ver 0.8 > > > I've looked it over and have a couple of questions and comments. > > - lines 158-159, "In the Receiver, ..." > also line 196, 3rd bullet in table > > These lines state: > > "In the Receiver, WindowSize determines the maximum number of messages > that the Receiver may receive at one time before sending Acknowledgement > Messages to the Sender." > > This seems either incorrect or misleading. The Receiver should be ack'ing > messages asynchronously, and as soon as possible. > > - lines 187-190, "When the Sender has sent all of the messages ..." > > This paragraph is stating that a Sender may perform the recovery > sequence that > it uses for timeout before a timeout has occurred. Why is this useful? Could > it be dropped? > > - line 258, "This method of Simple Routing ..." > > This is one instance of messaging parameters being acquired from "the CPA > or other suitable document". This might be expensive and error prone when > it is evaluated at multiple Hubs. Have you considered looking this up in > the initial Sending MSH and instantiating it in part of the XML Header? > > - lines 290-297, Editor Note 5: > > Same issue as above. Can the messaging parameters acquired from "the CPA > or other suitable document" really be acquired without the initial To and > From parties? > > - line 299, Figure 2-4 > > Can the DNM really be sent from URI=6 to URI=1, given the use of multiple > transports among the MSH's? > > > -- Andrew > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > Andrew Eisenberg > andrew.eisenberg@progress.com > Progress Software Corp. > 14 Oak Park phone: 781-280-4526 > Bedford, MA 01730 fax: 781-280-4949 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jim Hughes [mailto:jfh@fsc.fujitsu.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:02 PM > > To: Transport Work Group > > Subject: Proposed Revisions to MS ver 0.8 > > > > > > Attached is a partially complete proposal for modifying Message Service > > Spec v0.8, in PDF format (if you can't read it or need the Word version, > > just contact me). David Burdett is now drafting changes for the parts he > > agreed to update in our Tokyo meetings. If we have time this Thursday, we > > could discuss the Simple Routing and Window topics shown in the attached > > version, so please have a look at it before Thursday's teleconference. > > > > Jim > >
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Eisenberg;Andrew FN:Andrew Eisenberg ORG:Progress Software Corp. TEL;WORK;VOICE:(781) 280-4526 TEL;WORK;FAX:(781) 280-4949 ADR;WORK:;;14 Oak Park;Bedford;MA;01730 LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:14 Oak Park=0D=0ABedford, MA 01730 EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:andrew.eisenberg@progress.com REV:19991229T201624Z END:VCARD
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC