RE: TC154 vote on NWI - your approval needed

[ddobbing@attmail.com (DDOBBING)]

Henry,

Yes, fully agree.

Rgds
David

--- David Dobbing, Data Logistics, ddobbing@attmail.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Lowe 
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 December 2000 10:03 PM
> To: DDOBBING
> Cc: internet!lists.ebxml.org!ebxml-transport;
> internet!disa.org!sc32-1TAG; internet!attglobal.net!fvuille
> Subject: RE: TC154 vote on NWI - your approval needed
> 
> David,
> 
> I'm not against 6523, but don't believe it should be used exclusively 
> for ebXML.  Indeed, as ebXML will have to deal with EDI, it should be 
> supported.
> 
> Best regards,
> Henry
> ------------------------------------
> At 10:32 AM 12/12/2000 +0000, DDOBBING wrote:
> >Henry and William,
> >
> >By way of background, and to let you know the that ISO 6523 
> is alive and 
> >well.  For EDIFACT, the UNB (Interchange header) uses data 
> element 0007 
> >(Identification code qualifier) to qualify 0004 (Interchange sender 
> >identification) and 0010 (Interchange recipient identification).
> >
> >The point here is that the code list for 0007 (see below) is 
> aligned with 
> >ISO 6523, and as part maintenance process has its code 
> values assigned by 
> >the Maintenance Agency (MA) for ISO 6523.  As you will see 
> in the latest 
> >EDIFACT code list below (Oct 2000), there are number of new values 
> >(designated with a "+").  These were assigned by the ISO 
> 6523 MA within the 
> >last four months. 
> >
> >Rgds
> >David
> >
> >--- David Dobbing, Data Logistics, ddobbing@attmail.com 
> >