OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-transport message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: minutes 14-Dec-2000 TR&P con-call


I accept the action item.

thanx,
	doug

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: December 14, 2000 13:01
To: Doug Bunting
Cc: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: minutes 14-Dec-2000 TR&P con-call

Doug,

Thanks for the clarification. In that vein, I would note that I have
added an element to contain alternate PartyId's in the CPP and CPA dtd 
drafts I have published. The question then becomes whether we would want
each
alternate name to be sent, or whether the two parties have chosen
the form that eachother prefers (e.g. one could send a DUNS # and the
other send a DN value.

The multi-hop use-case is quite compelling.

I agree that we should re-open the issue for discussion and
a vote next week. Please let us use the list for the majority
of the discussion.

Doug, could you please provide a formal proposal which includes
recommendation for re-wording of the To section?

Cheers,

Chris

Doug Bunting wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, I was not on the call for the first issue.  I can
understand
> a wish to avoid point-to-multipoint distribution of an ebXML payload as a
> complicating issue.  However, what I was proposing in that comment was not
> such a distribution model.  I was focussing on allowing the originator to
> use multiple domains to identify the recipient.  This may be particularly
> important in multi-hop cases, where the originator does not know how to
> identify the end recipient to all intermediate MSHs.
> 
> Rather than add yet another requirement to the CPA, why not allow the
> originator to identify the recipient in whatever ways they have available.
> Each MSH could use its "favourite" domain from the provided list to
> correctly forward the payload (either to the application context or
another
> MSH).
> 
> Can this issue be reopened?
> 
> thanx,
>         doug
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
> Sent: December 14, 2000 09:11
> To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: minutes 14-Dec-2000 TR&P con-call
> 
> Attendees
> 
> Dick Brooks
> David Burdett
> Andrew Eisenberg
> Doug Bunting
> Chris Ferris
> Ralph Berwanger
> Prasad Yendluri
> Robert Adams
> Jerry ... AIAG (sorry, my system crashed with the original minutes...)
> Dale Moberg
> Maryann Hondo
> Rik Drummond
> Ian Jones (for less than a minute;-)
> 
> Minutes
> 
> Issue 10 - Multiple PartyId
> Detail -
> 7.9.1   - Recommend changing phrase PartyID element to 'one or more
> PartyID
> elements'.
> discussion. unanimous opposition. There will be likely ramifications
> with CPA which cannot be addressed. There are other ways of achieving
> the same effect (such as mail aliases).
> 
> Vote: not to accept
> 
> </ SNIP>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC