[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: comments on the editorial comments for this thursday's call
ANSI also uses normative appendices. It would be a good idea to include in each appendix title the phrase "(Normative)" or "(Non-Normative)". Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Rich Salz <rsalz@caveosystems.com> on 01/24/2001 10:37:43 PM To: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> cc: "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org> Subject: Re: comments on the editorial comments for this thursday's call > The transport bindings should, > IMHO, be normative and should be in the body of the document, not treated as an appendix.</CBF> It's not very common, but appendices can be normative. W3C does it, e.g. /r$
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC