OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-transport message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: Latest DRAFT of SMTP bindings


Chris,

> I thought that we discussed the issue of Content-Transfer-Encoding
> and agreed that it would apply at the transport level, not the MSH
> level and apply to the entire ebXML Message (the Message Package)
> not just selected body parts.

My recollection of the discussion was whether to encode at the 
element level (using SOAP encoding specified in chapter 5, SOAP-ENC:base64)
or the body part level. My meeting notes indicate that we agreed to encode
at the body part level only those body parts that require encoding. 
 
> 
> In addition, I thought that the issue of SOAP-Action was to be
> something agreed by the parties, that we would NOT impose a 
> value for SOAP-Action.
> 

My understanding is that SOAP-Action would be used for dispatching purposes
as a substitute for the MIME "type" parameter, which now contains a 
generic "text/xml" identifier.


Dick Brooks
Group 8760
110 12th Street North
Birmingham, AL 35203
dick@8760.com
205-250-8053
Fax: 205-250-8057
http://www.8760.com/

InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:20 AM
> To: Dick Brooks
> Cc: Ebxml
> Subject: Re: Latest DRAFT of SMTP bindings
> 
> 
> Dick,
> 
> I thought that we discussed the issue of Content-Transfer-Encoding
> and agreed that it would apply at the transport level, not the MSH
> level and apply to the entire ebXML Message (the Message Package)
> not just selected body parts.
> 
> In addition, I thought that the issue of SOAP-Action was to be
> something agreed by the parties, that we would NOT impose a 
> value for SOAP-Action.
> 
> Other than these comments, looks good!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> Dick Brooks wrote:
> > 
> > Here is what Prasad and I came up with for SMTP bindings, let 
> us know what
> > you think.
> > 
> > I don't have a pdf creator so I'm providing the MS word 
> version. Maybe one
> > of those kind individuals (maw?)
> > with a pdf converter will redistribute a pdf version of the doc.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Dick Brooks
> > Group 8760
> > 110 12th Street North
> > Birmingham, AL 35203
> > dick@8760.com
> > 205-250-8053
> > Fax: 205-250-8057
> > http://www.8760.com/
> > 
> > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
> > 
> >   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                                       Name: 
> ebXMLTransportBindings-SMTP.doc
> >    ebXMLTransportBindings-SMTP.doc    Type: Winword File 
> (application/msword)
> >                                   Encoding: BASE64


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC