RE: comments on David's proposed changes

["Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>]

Chris

You suggested removing the From element from Delivery Receipt. I disagree.
Reasons are in the attached.

On RefToMessageID, your points are already covered in the spec I think. See
details below.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:06 PM
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: comments on David's proposed changes


All,

I have attached a marked up version of David's proposed change for
separation of Acknowledgment and DeliveryReceipt. Save for the
comments I made in the attached, I am fine with the changes as
proposed. Nice job David!

As for the proposed change for support of RefToMessageId in the
context of a Message Status query, I am confused. Is the RefToMessageId
solo in the SOAP:Body with merely the Service/Action to identify the
request? 
>>>YES. This is the normal rules<<<
What about the response message that includes the StatusData
element. Shouldn't the StatusData element be augmented with the
RefToMessageId of the message being queried and the 
MessageHeader/MessageData/RefToMessageId refer to the MessageId of the
request message (as opposed to the MessageId of the message being queried)?
>>>RefToMessageId is already there.<<<

David, can you please comment?

Thanks,

Chris

Changes_to_Support_Separation_of_Delivery_Receipt_fromAcknowledgement DB.doc