[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: ebXML Messaging Service is a brilliant and extremely pragmatic pieceof standards work
"ebXML Messaging Service is a brilliant and extremely pragmatic piece of standards work..." (Wes Rishel of Gartner, on the WEDI business forum). William J. Kammerer FORESIGHT Corp. 4950 Blazer Pkwy. Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305 +1 614 791-1600 Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/ "accelerating time-to-trade"
- From: "Rishel,Wes" <wes.rishel@gartner.com>
- To: "'rachelf@ix.netcom.com'" <rachelf@ix.netcom.com>, PETERBARRY@aol.com,zon4@earthlink.net, business@wedi.org
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:30:43 -0400
I agree with Rachel completely. The ebXML Messaging Service is a brilliant and extremely pragmatic piece of standards work that solves a great number of the problems of secure use of the Internet for discrete transactions, such as the HIPAA transactions. Don't be put off by the XML in the name; the service is neutral as to the syntax of the payload. The fact that this spec was developed with major contributions from the vendors of application integration and security middleware products helps to ensure a speedy roll-out of compliant software. In particular btrade.com and Group8760 have been involved in doing X12 over the Internet for many years. In a "First Take" which should be available on Gartner.com on Thursday, I tell our clients that they should immediately begin to pressure their vendors to implement the MS. Health Level-7 is working on a specific profile describing how to use the ebXML MS for HL7 messages, both in the current "bars and carets" syntax and the new XML-based stuff. The only reservation I have about the MS at all is that it is the dependent on the Collaboration-Protocol Profile and Agreement Specification. The CPP-CPA is also a good piece of work, but it may be more than people want to bite off at one time. As I read the spec the reliance on the CPP-CPA is not absolute, but it will take some education for people to realize that. -----Original Message----- From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:rachelf@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 6:42 PM To: PETERBARRY@aol.com; Rishel,Wes; zon4@earthlink.net; business@wedi.org Subject: RE: HHS HIPAA FAQ Analysis Draft #1 Peter, et al, Before you try to design something new as you describe below I would recommend you take a look at the recently approved ebXML Message Services specifications. It addresses all of what you mention below and the payload for an ebXML message can be X12, XML, or whatever is needed. There's no need to redesign that which has already been designed by some of the best technical minds in the world. All of the ebXML specifications can be freely downloaded at http://www.ebxml.org Rachel Foerster Principal Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd. Strategies for Electronic Commerce 39432 North Avenue Beach Park, IL 60099 Phone: 847-872-8070 Fax: 847-872-6860 http://www.rfa-edi.com -----Original Message----- From: PETERBARRY@aol.com [mailto:PETERBARRY@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:56 PM To: wes.rishel@gartner.com; zon4@earthlink.net; business@wedi.org Subject: Re: HHS HIPAA FAQ Analysis Draft #1 Dear Wes: Your comments as usual are very insightful. I will shortly be drafting updates the SNIP DDE paper based on your and other comments. We have planned to describe how X12 can be imbedded in an http or even an html envelope with security quite effectively. The only language in earlier drafts that spoke to this was in the context of a solution in the computer-to-computer screen simulation paragraph, but that paragraph was removed for the time being while another round of question about it was sent to HHS. Again, thanks for you comments. Peter Peter Barry Peter T Barry Company Ozaukee Bank Building 1425 West Mequon Road Mequon Wisconsin 53092 (414) 732 5000 (national cell) peterbarry@aol.com ------------------------ In a message dated 5/19/2001 1:09:29 PM Central Daylight Time, wes.rishel@gartner.com writes: > Subj: RE: HHS HIPAA FAQ Analysis Draft #1 > Date: 5/19/2001 1:09:29 PM Central Daylight Time > From: wes.rishel@gartner.com (Rishel,Wes) > To: zon4@earthlink.net ('Zon Owen'), business@wedi.org > > This is a prodigious piece of work, and a valuable compilation. I would > like > to add one small set of comments here, in hopes that this is the right > venue, or that someone will guide me to the right venue. > > In the question and answer below it is unwise to use the term "real time" > interchangeable with "DDE". Once a health plan has the ability to determine > benefits or process some other transaction "in real time" it may apply to > DDE, where the health plan presents a user interface to a person who works > for a provider, or for real time processing of claims sent on a > machine-to-machine basis one at a time. The latter process is not batch but > it does require the us of the X12 format. > > It is important to recognize that although X12 transactions are almost > always transmitted in batches in healthcare, this is not a technological > limitation of X12 or the Internet. Other industries routinely transmit X12 > transactions over HTTP (i.e., in "real time") with a level of security that > meets all HIPAA requirements. > Do the format requirements apply only to batch transactions and not to > real-time/on-line transactions? > > [WEDI WP Codes: DDE] > > 2/1/2001: > > For real-time transactions, data entry screens must adhere to the data > standards but do not have to adhere to the format standards, as long as the > data is translated into the X12 format before it is transmitted. > > The clarity of this statement could be improved if it described before it is > transmitted to whom. Entering the data using DDE is a form of transmitting > the data. > ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: business-leave@wedi.org. Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: business-leave@wedi.org. Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: business-leave@wedi.org. Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC