[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Proposals to address SOAPAction header]
Chris, et al, Could someone please list in simple bullets why this action is being proposed. What are the perceived and reported problems that are referenced below in the phrase "...to address perceived and reported problems with the "SOAPAction" mechanism in the HTTP binding" Thanks, Joel -----Original Message----- From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 9:20 AM To: ebXML Transport (E-mail) Subject: [Fwd: Proposals to address SOAPAction header] FYI, from the xml-dist-app list. FWIW, I supported proposal B (below), to deprecate the SOAPAction HTTP header. Cheers, Chris -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Proposals to address SOAPAction header Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:42:52 -0400 (EDT) Resent-From: xml-dist-app@w3.org Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:42:20 -0700 From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com> To: XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org> The W3C XML Protocol Working Group is attempting to address perceived and reported problems with the "SOAPAction" mechanism in the HTTP binding (see SOAP 1.1 Section 6.1.1 [1]). As part of this process, the WG wishes to solicit comments and guidence on two proposals it has generated, as below. Comments must go to xmlp-comments@w3.org by 2001-06-18, and should address the proposals as they sit, and may optionally make general comments on resolution of issues with SOAPAction. Those representing the positions of particular groups or organisations are requested to clearly identify themselves as such. The WG encourages additional discussion on the xml-dist-app@w3.org mailing list. Neither of the following options precludes equivalent functionality elsewhere. Proposal A: Use of SOAPAction is discouraged. SOAPAction is an optional part of XMLP, supported but not required. Services MAY require SOAPAction and any software wishing to access those services MUST be able to send it. Proposal B: Use of SOAPAction is deprecated. Senders SHOULD NOT send SOAPAction. Receivers MUST NOT accept or reject messages on the basis of the presense, absence, or value of the SOAPAction header. Regards, Mark Nottingham for the W3C XML Protocol Working Group [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383528 -- Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC