OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-transport message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [Fwd: Proposals to address SOAPAction header]



Chris, et al,

Could someone please list in simple bullets why this action is being
proposed.  What are the perceived and reported problems that are referenced
below in the phrase 

	"...to address perceived and reported problems with the "SOAPAction"
mechanism in the HTTP binding"

Thanks, Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 9:20 AM
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: [Fwd: Proposals to address SOAPAction header]


FYI, from the xml-dist-app list.

FWIW, I supported proposal B (below), to deprecate the SOAPAction
HTTP header.

Cheers,

Chris

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Proposals to address SOAPAction header
Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:42:20 -0700
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
To: XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

The W3C XML Protocol Working Group is attempting to address perceived
and reported problems with the "SOAPAction" mechanism in the HTTP
binding (see SOAP 1.1 Section 6.1.1 [1]). As part of this process,
the WG wishes to solicit comments and guidence on two proposals it
has generated, as below.

Comments must go to xmlp-comments@w3.org by 2001-06-18, and should
address the proposals as they sit, and may optionally make general
comments on resolution of issues with SOAPAction. Those representing
the positions of particular groups or organisations are requested to 
clearly identify themselves as such. The WG encourages additional   
discussion on the xml-dist-app@w3.org mailing list.

Neither of the following options precludes equivalent functionality
elsewhere.

Proposal A:
Use of SOAPAction is discouraged. SOAPAction is an optional part of
XMLP, supported but not required. Services MAY require SOAPAction and
any software wishing to access those services MUST be able to send   
it.

Proposal B:
Use of SOAPAction is deprecated. Senders SHOULD NOT send SOAPAction.
Receivers MUST NOT accept or reject messages on the basis of the
presense, absence, or value of the SOAPAction header.

Regards,

Mark Nottingham
for the W3C XML Protocol Working Group


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383528


-- 
Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC