Re: One definition of "syntax-neutral"

[Nikola Stojanovic <nstojano@cjds.com>]

Hi Melanie,
If you look at your first msg with that subject you'll find that it was my
answer regarding a few issues (I hope you are not confused by the content of
the discussion). While I could respond just to ebXML-Core group, I thought
that it would be appropriate to CC our group as well.
Thanks
Nikola

----- Original Message -----
From: <melanie.mccarthy@gm.com>
To: <ebXML-Architecture@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: One definition of "syntax-neutral"


> I truly want to be a good participant in the ebXML-Architecture group, but
I
> have managed to become confused.  I don't know how the following scenario
> occurred, but when I logged in this evening, there appeared to be 5
related
> responses to a initial message that I don't have.  The problem was further
> compounded because it did not appear that the context of the message
matched the
> subject (i.e. One definition of "syntax-neutral verus a question on UML).
>
> Possibly this was a technology error but bottom line, I need help getting
on the
> right page and as an ongoing issue, we need to help each other stay
connected on
> these 'threads' of communication.
>
> Thanks
>
> Melanie
>