[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Compression (was RE: COMPLEXITY BIG ISSUE)
My experience is that compression of data before encryption is a commonly supported option of security packages. I see no need to separately address compression in our work efforts. Cheers, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Solinsky, Jason [mailto:solman@uspowersolutions.com] Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 4:09 PM To: 'David RR Webber'; David Burdett Cc: Ebxml; 'Dick Brooks'; ebXML Architecture (E-mail) Subject: RE: Compression (was RE: COMPLEXITY BIG ISSUE) > Can we further agree that compression is a red-herring!!! We are planning (as I understand it) to create standards for the use of encryption and authentication. Encryption and authentication by their very nature need to be performed at a lower level than compression. I therefore ask why security is our concern but not compression (which can significantly improve security by removing redundancy prior to encryption). JWS
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC