OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-architecture message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: Registry Submissions and Queries


Just wanted to clarify and make a couple of corrections to my previous comments.

First off, what I meant to say was that there had been an IETF pre-BOF and BOF on SOAP, not an 
OASIS TC. Sorry for the confusion. Its hard to keep all of these things straight sometimes.

Secondy, its important to distinguish between SOAP and XML-RPC. I'm told that there are 
certainly situations where XML-RPC might be a good thing. Apparently, there was a presentation 
at the BOF on the requirements for XML-RPC. I'm further told that there was a comparison 
between those requirements and what is available in SOAP. I'm told that that is where SOAP was 
found to be lacking.

I'm further told that, when thinking about XML-RPC, the key thing to keep in mind is the 
degree of synchronicity and coupling. In situations where syncronous operations and tight 
coupling between systems is required, then XML-RPC could be useful. Alternatively, if the 
systems should be able to operate asynchronously and loosely coupled, then XML-RPC might not 
be the best way to go.

If its a "real time" system, then one might tend to think that that is a situation where you 
would want synchronous operations and tight coupling.

Again, seeing as I'm obviously not very familiar with any of these things, take the above with 
a large grain of salt. I think I'll keep my mouth shut on this topic from here on in.

regards

pk

>From: "Petit, John" <jpetit@kpmg.com>
>To: "'Peter Kacandes'" <Peter.Kacandes@EBay.Sun.COM>, ebXML-Architecture@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: Registry Submissions and Queries
>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:59:12 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Petit, John 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 4:06 PM
>To: 'Peter Kacandes'; ebXML-Architecture@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: Registry Submissions and Queries
>
>
>In retrospect, a non-real time search system is probably the only way to put
>together searches across such immense and distributed
>databases/repositories. With ebXML as the framework to tie the worlds data
>together, real-time searches are not feasible. Therefore a central search
>system must send out a series of queries to all registered repositories
>(which could easily be in the tens of thousands). The system would have to
>wait for the query responses and organize them when they come back (also
>listing those systems it has not heard from). Such a mechanism may very well
>be a form of XML-RPC.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Kacandes [mailto:Peter.Kacandes@EBay.Sun.COM]
>Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 8:06 PM
>To: ebXML-Architecture@lists.oasis-open.org; jpetit@kpmg.com
>Subject: RE: Registry Submissions and Queries
>
>>
>><JOHN_RESPONSE>
>>I do not think that I follow you here. I assume that the above described
>>query is not what you have in mind for ebXML searches correct? XML-RPC
>would
>>be too slow for that task. In what context is this XML-RPC?
>></JOHN_RESPONSE>
>
>
>Agreed, some type of XML-RPC approach is not the way to go.
>
>
>
>Peter Kacandes
>
>Application Planning, Architecture & Strategy	phone number: 	X36529
>WWOPS IT/Supply Chain Management		email:	peter.kacandes@ebay
>
>****************************************************************************
>*
>The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
>It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
>is unauthorized. 
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
>or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
>and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
>contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
>the governing KPMG client engagement letter.         
>****************************************************************************
>*
>*****************************************************************************
>The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
>It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
>is unauthorized. 
>
>If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
>or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
>and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
>contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
>the governing KPMG client engagement letter.         
>*****************************************************************************

Peter Kacandes

Application Planning, Architecture & Strategy	phone number: 	X36529
WWOPS IT/Supply Chain Management		email:	peter.kacandes@ebay




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC