[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: ebXML metamodel write-up
hello joe, etc.. i just noticed that there is a 'later' requirements doc on the site at: http://www.ebxml.org/specdrafts/ReqSpecv1-0.pdf - it links off the page... http://www.ebxml.org/specindex2.htm - however this is titled: electronic business XML (ebXML) Requirements Specification Version 1.0 ebXML Requirements Specification 12 May 2000 - whereas the one voted on was dated 11 May 2000. i presume this one is up for approval at the plenary. Joseph Baran wrote: > Chris: > > The URL you provided does indeed have copies of the Requirements document > in various formats. > > However, the version of the document is _not_ the version which was > approved at the Brussels plenary. > > It is apparently the April 28th version which was originally offered for a > vote on Monday, but was then withdrawn and revised during the week in > Brussels. > The revision which was actually approved was distributed in Brussels in > hardcopy, but I (like William) have never been able to find it in a file > form posted anywhere at all. > > If anyone knows of one, I (and others) would certainly appreciate a link to > it. > > Thanks, > > Joe Baran > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Ferris [SMTP:chris.ferris@east.sun.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 5:03 PM > To: William J. Kammerer > Cc: ebXML Requirements; ebXML-Architecture List > Subject: Re: ebXML metamodel write-up > > http://www.ebxml.org/specindex1.htm > > This is the URL for the requirements document, > even if it still is listed as Draft status. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > "William J. Kammerer" wrote: > > > > Duane Nickull says the discovery stuff - i.e., identifying which trading > > partners are capable of engaging into a given electronic business > > transaction and who provide certain products and services - is > > "explicitly out of scope of ebXML." Further, "The discovery phase has > > not been addressed in the TA Spec nor have they been included in any > > discussions. I did not recall it being included in the Requirements > > Document which mandated our Technical Architecture Specification." > > > > This is what I thought was in all the Requirements drafts before > > Brussels. Who took it out? Will we ever know? -the Requirements > > document approved at the Brussels plenary is not available at > > http://www.ebxml.org/specindex.htm. It's not available at the > > Requirements Project Team working directory, either. Does anybody know > > where it is? Did we lose it? > > > > William J. Kammerer > > FORESIGHT Corp. > > 4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy. > > Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305 > > +1 614 791-1600 > > > > Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/ > > "Commerce for a New World" > > -- > _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect > _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063 > _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Email: chris.ferris@East.Sun.COM > _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ Sun Microsystems, Mailstop: UBUR03-313 > _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903 -- regards tim mcgrath TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
begin:vcard n:McGrath;Tim tel;pager:+61(0)299633829 tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228 tel;fax:+61(0)893352142 tel;work:+61(0)893352228 x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376 fn:tim mcgrath end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC