Re: ebXML: TA doc

["agrangard@nycall.com" <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>]

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Suttor <Jeff.Suttor@eng.sun.com>
To: <anders.grangard@edifrance.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:54 AM
Subject: ebXML: TA doc


> Anders, could you please forward this to the list?  The list will not let
me
> post at the current time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jeff.Suttor@Sun.com      http://sun.com/xml
> XML Technology Center    http://web.eng/xml
>
>
> ------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------
>
> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 16:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jeff Suttor <Jeff.Suttor@eng.sun.com>
> Subject: ebXML: TA doc
> To: ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
>
> feedback on the latest doc:
>
> - we shouldn't specify implementation details like the name of files
> - 6.5.3
> - 6.5.4
> - move 7.3 to the appendix
> - move 8.3 to the appendix
> - 9.2 (para 5) is too specific when it mentions OASIS
> - 9.3 (para 5) "     "
> - 10.4.2 pick one char set
> - 10.6.e mention of CGI is too implementation specific
> - 10.8.3 fig x.x mentions magic file name again, let the implementors
>   decide
> - 10.10.b remove 8 bytes comment, let implementors decide
>
> it is also too long. should be a shorter doc with a few simple figures.
we
> should be showing high level architecture.  could we focus on just showing
the
> components, how they fit together and what they expose at their edges?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jeff.Suttor@Sun.com      http://sun.com/xml
> XML Technology Center    http://web.eng/xml
>
> ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
>
>
>