Re: Conformance and naming

[duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Anders:

THis comment is slightly out of context.  IT is probably my fault for
not telling those of you who were not involved in the last two weeks of
the TA document work. Here is the lowdown:

Conformance Testing:

Was completely removed upon the QRT Teams decision that it has no place
in the TA spec.

Naming COnventions:

THe jury is out on this one but it can be added during the comment
period.  This should not hold back the document in any way from being
released for comments.

THe work we need you to do is to formally submit the GLossary to the QRT
Team in the appropriate format.  This should be done as soon as COlin
can deliver it to you.

Duane

"agrangard@nycall.com" wrote:
> 
> The TechArch team has been working hard and late hours to take the received
> comments of our specification into account and we will shortly circulate an
> updated version that I hope will impress you as it has me. In the process
> there are two important issues that have surfaced which need immediate
> attention from the steering committee. Conformance rules and naming
> conventions are being worked on by our team as they affect all or most of
> the other teams. We need to resolve quickly whether these are in or out of
> scope. If they are in-scope, which I certainly think, we need to allocate
> them to the appropriate group.
> 
> Kind regards
> Anders Grangard