[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re:Conformance and naming
The approved ebXML Requirements Specification clearly identifies naming conventions as a responsibility of technical architecture (Section 3.4, bullet 8) to wit - "In coordination with BP process specification and core components identification, provide for naming conventions for technical and business content in the technical architecture". The approved specification also states that the TA team is responsible to "Provide design guidelines for ebXML compliant messages". (Section 3.4, bullet 9). In the candidate requirements document submitted to the Plenary on 7 May, the requirements team originally included a requirement for the technical coordination and support project team to provide "A clear definition of ebXML compliance." However, this requirement was dropped at the insistance of the TCS Project Team lead. If memory serves me correctly, the TCS project team lead stated a conformance definition was the responsibility of Technical Architecture. Mark Mark Crawford Research Fellow E-business Strategies ______ LMI Logistics Management Institute 2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805 (703) 917-7177 Fax (703) 917-7518 mcrawfor@lmi.org http://www.lmi.org "Opportunity is what you make of it" ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: Conformance and naming Author: "agrangard@nycall.com" <anders.grangard@edifrance.org> Date: 10/16/00 5:42 PM The TechArch team has been working hard and late hours to take the received comments of our specification into account and we will shortly circulate an updated version that I hope will impress you as it has me. In the process there are two important issues that have surfaced which need immediate attention from the steering committee. Conformance rules and naming conventions are being worked on by our team as they affect all or most of the other teams. We need to resolve quickly whether these are in or out of scope. If they are in-scope, which I certainly think, we need to allocate them to the appropriate group. Kind regards Anders Grangard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC