Subject: Re: CC minutes
Anders/team, With regards to: "Nicola reported that only one response had been received on his email on the subject, which should be called Capitalisation rather than naming convention to avoid confusion with the work being performed by the Core Components team on the semantic aspects. It was agreed that this should remain a task for the Technical Architecture but close cooperation with the other teams is needed." Why does this never seem to get resolved and finalized? There has been some discussion around this for as long as I can recall. We (TR&P and TP teams) need to have the issue resolved once and for all. I am in favor of the proposal (UpperCamelCase for Elements, lowerCamelCase for attributes), but without clear guidance, we're likely to end up with a bunch of DTD or XSD schemas which have differing capitalization schemes which is (IMHO) unprofessional and would reflect poorly. PLEASE make a CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS decision on this matter and do so quickly. We are trying to finalize these various DTD/XSD schemas that the infrastructure components define/require. Thanks, Chris "agrangard@nycall.com" wrote: > > Please find attached the minutes from yesterday's TA conference call. > > regards > > Anders Grangard > Edifrance > Ingénieur - Consultant en Commerce électronique > Tel: +33 (0)1 42 91 62 24 > http://www.edifrance.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Name: TA_CC_141200.doc > TA_CC_141200.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword) > Encoding: BASE64
begin:vcard n:Ferris;Christopher tel;cell:508-667-0402 tel;work:781-442-3063 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Sun Microsystems, Inc;XTC Advanced Development adr:;;One Network Drive;Burlington;Ma;01803-0903;USA version:2.1 email;internet:chris.ferris@east.sun.com title:Senior Staff Engineer fn:Christopher Ferris end:vcard
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC