Re: comment on TA specification

ebxml-architecture message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: comment on TA specification

From: duane <duane@xmlglobal.com>
To: "Cunningham, Robert" <CunninghamR@MTMC.ARMY.MIL>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:54:52 -0800

"Cunningham, Robert" wrote:

>                 "Each Trading Partner SHALL register at least one CPP in an
> ebXML
>                 compliant Registry system."
>>>

How about

"Each Trading Partner SHALL register at least one CPP with an ebXML
 compliant Registry system.  Trading Partners may create more than 
 one CPP document in instances where they deem it necessary to meet
 their business needs"

Comments?

Duane

Follow-Ups:
- Re: comment on TA specification
  - From: Joaquin Miller <miller@joaquin.net>
- Re: comment on TA specification
  - From: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>

References:
- RE: comment on TA specification
  - From: "Cunningham, Robert" <CunninghamR@MTMC.ARMY.MIL>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]