OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-architecture message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: TA spec v1.0.2 ready for submission to QR team

Title: TA spec v1.0.2 ready for submission to QR team

I agree with Duane. Karsten's comments have been addressed and all outstanding action items have been disposed of. Version 1.0.2 has been posted to the TA Private page [1], and Duane will be submitting the document to the QR team for review, which will allow us to vote on the document during the Vancouver plenary. Keep in mind that there are a few outstanding action items (see Stefano's comments [2]), which SHALL be disposed of during the ebXML meeting in Vancouver, as per Anders email request that they be addressed by the Steering Committee.

[1] http://www.ebxml.org/project_teams/technical_arch/private/
[2] http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-architecture/200102/msg00004.html

Best Regards,


PS - I'm off to London, so I will be out of email contact until tomorrow morning.

-----Original Message-----
From: Duane Nickull [mailto:duane@xmlglobal.com]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Nikola Stojanovic
Cc: ebxml-architecture@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: TA spec 1.0.1

Almost all of the outstanding issues have been dealt with.  Currently,
there is only one which we feel will be mitigated by this afternoon.

The suggestion of Anders will lead to our spec being postponed for
voting by the plenary for another three months.  This is not acceptable.

Everyone has had a chance to read the comments disposition.  This is not
a comment period.  As per Brian's email,  this is to review comments
disposition only.  The people who have submitted comments have been
satisfied with one exception that we are working on.

Let's move forwards, not sideways ;-)


Nikola Stojanovic wrote:
> <Anders Grangard>
> After reviewing the disposition document of the TA spec 1.0.1, I recommend
> that the specification and the disposition of the comments from the second
> review period are made available to the ebXML community. I am aware of that
> we today received some comments on the disposition document, but if we want
> to allow the ebXML members reasonable time to review what they are going to
> vote on next week, these should be dealt with in parallel. Any unresolved
> issue that remains after this week should be addressed at the steering
> committee meeting the 11 Feb.
> </Anders Grangard>
> I support the same logistics with addition that the TA group should have a
> chance to review outstanding issues on Monday, February 12 as per your
> timelines.
> Regards,
> Nikola Stojanovic
> Lead Technologist, Research and Development
> Encoda Systems, Inc.
> 101 Pineview Terrace
> Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
> nikola.stojanovic@encodasystems.com
> Tel: 607-273-2224

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC