FW: ebXML Registry and Repository Teleconference Minutes: August 23, 2000

[Bob Haugen <linkage@interaccess.com>]

-----Original Message-----
From:	Nieman, Scott [SMTP:Scott.Nieman@NorstanConsulting.com]
Sent:	Friday, March 24, 2000 11:12 AM
To:	'Bob Haugen'; 'ebxml-regrep@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject:	RE: ebXML Registry and Repository Teleconference Minutes: August 23, 2000

Since the original requestors of that deliverable were not on the phone
call, I have a difficult time answering that question.  We tabled the topic.

We are interested in the BP metamodel, and we believe that software can
check submissions if they are in a known, specified form to determine if the
submissions meets the min requirements per the  BP metamodel.  We call it
the Quality Assurance Service.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 4:54 PM
To: 'ebxml-regrep@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: ebXML Registry and Repository Teleconference Minutes:
August 23, 2000


>) Brussels Deliverables
>Scott Nieman proposed that the team break up into two groups focused on 1)
>The workflow activity diagrams, and 2) the Classification schemes.  

Question:  how do the classification schemes relate to the ebXML-BP
metamodel? Or do they?

Thanks,
Bob Haugen