[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Collaboration Services (was: Business Service Interface)
<Jean-Jacques Dubray> If you read our proposal, this is why the sequencing rules include "time out". However, we restricted the "public logic" to two types of business rules: 1) time out 2) branching based on a response type within a collaboration. </Jean-Jacques Dubray> I did read your proposal, but was not commenting on your sequencing rules. The beginning of this current disagreement (?) was when I stated my opinion that message sequence numbers and linked lists were inadequate for many business collaborations. You seemed to be disagreeing vehemently. Branching on a response type is different from either, and I agree permits many more variations. I will need to think about how well it works for the two use cases I cited in a previous message in this thread, and will now go and do that... -Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC