[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: security and timing parameters
Karsten and all, Is this a test to see if we are paying attention? (Note: this is the only parameter assignment I have payed attention to so far.) <KR> NOTE: I am not putting timeToAcknowledgeReceipt and timeToAcknowledgeAcceptance into RequestingBusinessActivity even though they were in the BusinessActivity superclass. They are only relevant to the responding activity. I actually think TimeToPerform is not relevent to the requestor either, but leaving it here for now. </KR> My reading of the spec indicates that both Responding and Requesting BusinessActivities use those parameters in different ways. The transaction is a unit of work from the viewpoint of the Requesting activity; therefore, if the time parameters are exceeded (that is, the required ack or document does not arrive by the appointed time), the Requesting activity can abort the transaction. From the description of TimeToAcknowlegeReceipt: "A sending partner must retry a commercial transaction if necessary or must send notification of failed business control (possibly revoking a contractual offer) if a responding partner does not verify properly receipt of a business document request within the agreed time period. The time to acknowledge receipt is the duration from the time a business document request is sent by a requesting partner until the time a verification of receipt is "properly received" by the requesting business partner. This verification of receipt is an audit-able business signal and is instrumental in contractual obligation transfer during a contract formation process (e.g. offer/accept)." -Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC