RE: ebXML and RosettaNet

[Erik.J.Leckner@seagate.com]

Krishna, John, Karsten, Nita,Gregory, John (and any others)

Thank you all for the useful information.



Best Regards,
Erik J Leckner
Seagate Technology, LLC
San Jose, CA
Director, Technical Architecture & Standards






Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com> on 03/23/2001 02:47:49 PM

To:   Erik.J.Leckner@seagate.com, ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
cc:

Subject:  RE: ebXML and RosettaNet


Erik,

     There are a few different ways this would be done:

     1.   ebXML TRP can be a replacement for the RNIF, transporting
payloads
conforming to RosettaNet DTDs.
          In this case, the applications would need to handle exceptions
and
choreographies as defined by the PIP. One potential advantage here is we
can
have a light-weight infrastructure using apache and soap.

     2.   Another way is to define ebXML BPs which specify exchanging XML
documents based on the RosettaNet PIPs - including the choreography as well
as exceptions. An ebXML complaint software can then run these business
processes.

     3.   Another related scenario is ebXML complementing existing
standards (like
RosettaNet) by adding core components and business processes supporting
more
verticals and industries. Remember core components would add vocabularies
(DTDs, Schemas et al) and the BP would add business processes, specific to
those industries.

          This is the extensible part of ebXML

     4.   In short, I do not see ebXML replacing RosettaNet PIPs, as the
PIPs are
mature business processes. But RN is limited to a few verticals and
business
processes. So ebXML has the opportunity to add more verticals and
industries
this co-existing with RN.

     Hope it helps.

cheers



|-----Original Message-----
|From: Erik.J.Leckner@seagate.com [mailto:Erik.J.Leckner@seagate.com]
|Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 1:55 PM
|To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
|Subject: ebXML and RosettaNet
|Importance: High
|
|
|
|Hi,
|
|
|Could anyone please answer the following question?
|
|Will ebXML's components be a replacement for RosettaNet PIP documents
|transferred in b2b
|exchanges or will ebxml support RosettaNet PIPs, as is? I would like to
|know whether or not
|this will change as ebXML defines similar specifications for industries
|such as disk-drive designers/manufacturers (computer hardware, etc.).
|
|Best Regards,
|Erik J Leckner
|Seagate Technology, LLC
|San Jose, CA
|Director, Technical Architecture & Standards
|
|
|
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
|"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org
|


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org