[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Notification of failure semantics
In today's BPSS conference call, we discussed the reasons for notifications of failure, that is, the notification sent when a responding activity thinks a transaction will succeed and the requesting party has reasons to determine that the transaction should fail. We only listed time out as the only reason. After the call, I went back to UMM, which says there are other reasons: "Notification of failure shall only be initiated when a terminating transaction does not leave both parties with a mutual agreement as to the state of a business transaction. This condition exists when: 1. The initiating partner's business activity times-out when waiting for a specified response to its requesting business document. 2. The responding business document is erroneous, not authorized or not digitally signed as agreed to in a Trading Partner Agreement." -Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC