Re: BP modeling - followup to Apr 11 Analysis conf call

[Jim Clark <jdc-icot@lcc.net>]

I absolutely concur with both points.

Jim Clark

"Welsh, David" wrote:

> > 1. The overall idea of the BPSS is to produce the XML DTD
> > that all ebXML
> > Business process will have to conforme to.
>
> Sorry Antoine, I know you discuss it further in your email but to be
> precise, ebXML business processes 'SHALL' conform to the TMWG UMM as stated
> in the Technical Architecture. The discussion of alignment of BPSS to UMM is
> perhaps another activity underway as part of the efforts of all to develope
> ebXML "version 1.0" for May release in Vienna.
>
> Also it is very encouraging to read that tool makers with the vision such as
> MEGA are already addressing these BP needs, and it's encouraging to hear you
> were able to implement BPSS as is. Additionally, your experience and
> guidance in the real world operating considerations with respect to UML is
> refreshing and valuable to hear. I don't think I've seen enough attention to
> that yet, with all the great work everyone is putting in right now, but I'm
> confident due attention will come about as people like yourself start really
> deploying the tools, products and services for the ebXML community; and
> we'll find out where corners were inadvertantly cut by mistake !!
>
> All the best
> Dave Welsh
>
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org

begin:vcard 
n:Clark;James
tel;cell:936.524.4424
tel;work:936.264.3366
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:I.C.O.T.
adr:;;10987 Quinlan N Lake;Conroe;TX;77303;
version:2.1
email;internet:jdc-icot@lcc.net
title:Principal Consultant
fn:James Clark
end:vcard