Re: TA-Section-6-Revision-WIP-0.1.doc

[Jim Clark <jdc-icot@lcc.net>]

Karsten Riemer wrote:

> Brian,
> you did a great job.
> If the BP team in general supports this rewording of TA chapter 6, I think we
> have a great improvement of the overall TA document. I have two reservations:
>
> 1. It should say "ebXML recommends that the business process and business
> information artifacts ....." (not requires) Alternatively we should expand the
> wording to say that a subset of the UMM metamodel is currently part of the
> ebXML specifications (through the Specification Schema, and that as UN/CEFACT
> finalizes and evolves UMM we expect that additional parts of the UMM metamodel
> will become part of the ebXML specifications, and therefore then will require
> conformance of additional artifacts.

NO - ABSOLUTELY NOT- This MUST be the minimal level of compliance and this level
of compliance will not be enough.

Jim Clark


>
> 2. Rather than deleting section 6.3. move its content to right between the
> current titles 7 and 7.1 and change title of section 7 to read "ebXML
> architecture overview".
>
> I will be sending out my rewording of chapter 8.2. shortly.
>
> thanks,
> -karsten
>
> >Here are is my suggested rewording for Section 6 of the ebXML Technical
> >Architecture specification.  I hope I have adequately captured our
> >discussions on this matter.  Let me know if you feel I have not or can
> >provided better wording.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Brian
> > <<TA-Section-6-Revision-WIP-0.1.doc>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org

begin:vcard 
n:Clark;James
tel;cell:936.520.7428
tel;work:936.264.3366
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:I.C.O.T.
adr:;;10987 Quinlan N Lake;Conroe;TX;77303;
version:2.1
email;internet:jdc-icot@lcc.net
title:Principal Consultant
fn:James Clark
end:vcard