OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-bp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: TA chapter review and request for vote


I agree with Karsten's re-wording of TAS, section 8.2.

Randy Clark

-----Original Message-----
From: Karsten Riemer [mailto:Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:25 PM
To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
Cc: Hayes, Brian
Subject: TA chapter review and request for vote


To BP list:

Here is my rewording of section 8.2. of the TA document. It contains a list
of
corrections needed, and a rationale for each. Following that is the actual
corrected document with amended figures. If you have the right version of
Word, you may view the change log, if not and if you would like a copy
showing
the change log, please contact me.

This is being sent out to BP list for an informal vote on whether we should
request the TA team to submit these changes to the Executive committee. This
must be done this Friday at the latest. Therefore our 'vote' will be 
following the 'white ballot' rule, i.e. unless you vote NO, or vote to
amend,
and do so by end of Thursday, it is assumed that you vote YES. Please vote
on
the chapter attached here, as well as the one just sent out by Brian Hayes.

thanks,
-karsten

PS: Brian, I cannot send to analysis list, will you forward please?
>Brian,
>you did a great job.
>If the BP team in general supports this rewording of TA chapter 6, I think
>we
>have a great improvement of the overall TA document. I have two
>reservations:
>
>1. It should say "ebXML recommends that the business process and business
>information artifacts ....." (not requires) Alternatively we should expand
>the
>wording to say that a subset of the UMM metamodel is currently part of the
>ebXML specifications (through the Specification Schema, and that as
>UN/CEFACT
>finalizes and evolves UMM we expect that additional parts of the UMM
>metamodel
>will become part of the ebXML specifications, and therefore then will
>require
>conformance of additional artifacts.
>
>2. Rather than deleting section 6.3. move its content to right between the
>current titles 7 and 7.1 and change title of section 7 to read "ebXML
>architecture overview".
>
>I will be sending out my rewording of chapter 8.2. shortly.
>
>thanks,
>-karsten
>
>>Here are is my suggested rewording for Section 6 of the ebXML Technical
>>Architecture specification.  I hope I have adequately captured our
>>discussions on this matter.  Let me know if you feel I have not or can
>>provided better wording.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Brian
>> <<TA-Section-6-Revision-WIP-0.1.doc>> 
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
>"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC