[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: multi-party collaboration test cases
The BP Specification Schema and the UMM Metamodel have somewhat different approaches to multi-party business collaborations. The ebXML "infrastructure release" will have some limitations in this area. The Spec Schema tries to get around those limitations, but this topic was raised by the QR team as a significant potential problem. My purpose in this message is *not* to debate the merits of any particular design, but to start to ground the issue in real-world test cases. I think if we desk-check the Spec Schema against a set of good test cases we will have a much better idea of what we can and cannot do with it. To that end, I am trying to collect multi-party collaboration scenarios. Here is what I have so far: *Jim Clark's DSL field service collaboration POC proposal, with Subscriber, Communication Provider, and multiple Field Labor Providers. *David Welsh's Dotcom Dropship scenario with Customer, Dotcom, Vendor, Carrier and Credit Authority. *Sig Handelman's Core Components POC proposal with Buyer, Seller and Payment Authority. *Andrew Chilcott's UK Securities Transaction Flow with Fund Manager, Broker, Registrars, Stock Exchange, Settlement System, Trader, Banks, etc. (I'll post this somewhere when this activity gets organized.) The above may enough, at least to start with. How much interest is out there for this kind of an activity? Can we put together some kind of session in Vancouver? Thanks, Bob Haugen
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC