RE: Unresolved issues in worksheet?

["Welsh, David" <David.Welsh@nordstrom.com>]

Charlie, 
but economic concepts is a basic element of business. Shouldn't REA, well as
much as UMM describes at least, figure directly into the worksheets
themselves ? Seems to belong in there.
Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlie Fineman [mailto:fineman@arzoon.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: 'Bob Haugen'; 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)'
> Cc: 'Clare Shemeta'
> Subject: RE: Unresolved issues in worksheet?
> 
> 
> Bill was going to flesh out the appendix on REA. The main body of the
> worksheets does not really go into much detail on the topic.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:06 PM
> To: 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)'
> Cc: 'Clare Shemeta'
> Subject: Unresolved issues in worksheet?
> 
> 
> I am looking at BpWorksheets-WIP-0.8b.doc (slightly out of date,
> but the latest one I have) and find some comments from Clare
> Shemeta about some paragraphs that I wrote about REA.
> 
> I thought the comments were constructive - they pointed to
> places where I had been (shall we say) less than precise.
> 
> Is it still useful to adress Clare's issues?  I.e. is the REA
> section still in the worksheet?  Has anybody else made
> the necessary changes?  
> 
> If I should make changes, could somebody please send me
> the latest and greatest worksheet?
> 
> Thanks, 
> Bob Haugen
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: 
> ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: 
> ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org
>