RE: Unresolved issues in worksheet?

[Charlie Fineman <fineman@arzoon.com>]

After Brian and I discussed it on Friday, we decided to work the concept of
economic events directly into the main body of the document but not the full
REA model. Our conclusion was that REA was a specialization of what was
representable by UMM. There is a note in the section where we start to talk
about business collaborations (and I will add one in the overview) that UMM
and ebXML are recommending the REA ontology for business process elaboration
and refering people to the appendix for a more complete treatment on the
subject. I would suggest that REA oriented worksheets go in that appendix.

Reactions?

P.S. My changes are not complete, I will send off what I have before I take
off for appointments this morning. Had to put out fires at work yesterday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Welsh, David [mailto:David.Welsh@nordstrom.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 4:02 PM
To: 'Charlie Fineman'; 'Bob Haugen'; 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)'
Cc: 'Clare Shemeta'
Subject: RE: Unresolved issues in worksheet?


Charlie, 
but economic concepts is a basic element of business. Shouldn't REA, well as
much as UMM describes at least, figure directly into the worksheets
themselves ? Seems to belong in there.
Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlie Fineman [mailto:fineman@arzoon.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: 'Bob Haugen'; 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)'
> Cc: 'Clare Shemeta'
> Subject: RE: Unresolved issues in worksheet?
> 
> 
> Bill was going to flesh out the appendix on REA. The main body of the
> worksheets does not really go into much detail on the topic.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Haugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:06 PM
> To: 'ebXML-CCBP-Analysis (E-mail)'
> Cc: 'Clare Shemeta'
> Subject: Unresolved issues in worksheet?
> 
> 
> I am looking at BpWorksheets-WIP-0.8b.doc (slightly out of date,
> but the latest one I have) and find some comments from Clare
> Shemeta about some paragraphs that I wrote about REA.
> 
> I thought the comments were constructive - they pointed to
> places where I had been (shall we say) less than precise.
> 
> Is it still useful to adress Clare's issues?  I.e. is the REA
> section still in the worksheet?  Has anybody else made
> the necessary changes?  
> 
> If I should make changes, could somebody please send me
> the latest and greatest worksheet?
> 
> Thanks, 
> Bob Haugen
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: 
> ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: 
> ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org