Subject: Re: BP modeling - followup to Apr 11 Analysis conf call
I absolutely concur with both points. Jim Clark "Welsh, David" wrote: > > 1. The overall idea of the BPSS is to produce the XML DTD > > that all ebXML > > Business process will have to conforme to. > > Sorry Antoine, I know you discuss it further in your email but to be > precise, ebXML business processes 'SHALL' conform to the TMWG UMM as stated > in the Technical Architecture. The discussion of alignment of BPSS to UMM is > perhaps another activity underway as part of the efforts of all to develope > ebXML "version 1.0" for May release in Vienna. > > Also it is very encouraging to read that tool makers with the vision such as > MEGA are already addressing these BP needs, and it's encouraging to hear you > were able to implement BPSS as is. Additionally, your experience and > guidance in the real world operating considerations with respect to UML is > refreshing and valuable to hear. I don't think I've seen enough attention to > that yet, with all the great work everyone is putting in right now, but I'm > confident due attention will come about as people like yourself start really > deploying the tools, products and services for the ebXML community; and > we'll find out where corners were inadvertantly cut by mistake !! > > All the best > Dave Welsh > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-ccbp-analysis-request@lists.ebxml.org
begin:vcard n:Clark;James tel;cell:936.524.4424 tel;work:936.264.3366 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:I.C.O.T. adr:;;10987 Quinlan N Lake;Conroe;TX;77303; version:2.1 email;internet:jdc-icot@lcc.net title:Principal Consultant fn:James Clark end:vcard
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC