Re: [Fwd: To the QA team]

[nagwa <nagwa.abdelghfour@sun.com>]

I don't think we should be responsible for editing any documents, our
responsibility is to evaluate that the documents are aligned with the ebxml.org
vision, validate the documents with the ebxml.org's approved requirements
document, there is no overlaps or conflicts, and provide complete and correct
information about the purpose of this document.

Nagwa

Tim McGrath wrote:

> this was posted to the steering committee list.
>
> i am unclear what rik is asking for.  - us to act as editors???
>
> --
> regards
> tim mcgrath
> TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: To the QA team
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:05:17 -0500
> From: richard drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>
> To: Ebxml-Stc <ebxml-stc@lists.ebxml.org>
>
> Bob and Dick, as my team edits the documents, i seems to me it will be
> necessary that we extend our editing processes some what. the trp team has
> changed the comments forms and put a new column in which tell what kind of
> comment it is... such as technical, typo.... and such. also we need to make
> the team editor function clearly the one in charge of the comment process.
> we have discussed this before. i think the qa team should be responsible for
> this process across all teams. we, the stc, will have to put the process in
> place and have qa run it. what do you think?  best regards, rik
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   tim mcgrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au >
>
>   tim mcgrath
>     <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au >
>     Pager: +61(0)299633829
>     Cellular: +61 (0)438352228
>     Fax: +61(0)893352142
>     Work: +61(0)893352228
>     Conference Software Address
>   Additional Information:
>   Last Name     McGrath
>   First Name    Tim
>   Version       2.1