Re: [Fwd: To the QA team]

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>]

you are correct this needs to be clarified.

i understood we had only a advisory role to the executive - they may choose to
approve/disapprove based on our recommendations.


nagwa wrote:

> It looks good, the only thing I am not sure about it is,  are we going to give our
> opinion only or we suppose to approve / disapprove ( with explaining why in the case
> of disapprove ) that this document is ready to go public?
>
> Nagwa
>
> Tim McGrath wrote:
>
> > The steering committee have asked us to put 1-2 paragrpahs on the web site of what
> > we will be addressing with our reviews (along the lines of dick, nagwa and tony's
> > comments below).
> >
> > How about ...
> > --------------------
> > The QR team will give an opinion on all deliverables, before they go to public
> > review.  Our responsibility is to evaluate that the documents are aligned with the
> > ebxml.org vision, validate the documents with the ebxml.org's approved
> > requirements document, there is no overlaps or conflicts, and provide complete and
> > correct information about the purpose of this document.
> >
> > The QR team does not look at (or edit) details.  However, we may suggest "best
> > practice" for managing comments/input to evolving documents and propagating these
> > across the various project teams.
> > ---------------------
> >
> > "A.J. (Tony) Blazej" wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Nagwa. The most we might want to do is determine "best practice"
> > > for managing comments/input to evolving document and propagating these across
> > > the various project teams.
> > > Tony
> > > At 09:29 AM 9/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >Subject: Re: [Fwd: To the QA team]
> > > >To: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au
> > > >Cc: "'ebXML Coordination'" <ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org>
> > > >
> > > >I don't think we should be responsible for editing any documents, our
> > > >responsibility is to evaluate that the documents are aligned with the
> > > >ebxml.org
> > > >vision, validate the documents with the ebxml.org's approved requirements
> > > >document, there is no overlaps or conflicts, and provide complete and correct
> > > >information about the purpose of this document.
> > > >
> > > >Nagwa
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > tim mcgrath
> > TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> > phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

begin:vcard 
n:McGrath;Tim
tel;pager:+61(0)299633829
tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228
tel;fax:+61(0)893352142
tel;work:+61(0)893352228
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au 
x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376
fn:tim mcgrath
end:vcard