[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: facilitation of TRP MHS spec by QR
The QR Team accept your suggestion that if we receive the document on Monday 16th we shall reply by 18:00 PST on Thursday 19th. PS I am unclear about your comment - a. will this document now encompass errors, reliable messaging and security? b. is there a formal change log of modifications made since the previous version? Rik Drummond wrote: > the new trp document has been reformatted into the ebXML format, three > people have submitted sections on errors, reliable messaging and security > during this round of comments. everything else is the same except for two > other technical comments... Rik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim McGrath [mailto:timcgra@attglobal.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:58 PM > To: Rik Drummond > Cc: Ebxml-Stc; 'ebXML Coordination' > Subject: Re: facilitation of TRP MHS spec by QR > > All Team Leaders should be aware that it appears several deliverables may be > submitted for QR over the upcoming weeks. To date we have worked on a > first-come, first-serve basis. > > However, there are some differences with the TRP MS spec: > a. it is on its second review. > we would expect this not to take the full 5 days allocated. our intention > for > the second review is to focus on the change log - so this is an important > part > of your submission. > > b. it is the only document likely to be voted in the plenary. > > Under these circumstances i will put it on the agenda at our teleconference > this Thursday and i shall propose we endorse what you suggest. > > I will report back to you on this. > > Rik Drummond wrote: > > > We are very short on time to get the spec voted on at Tokyo. We could have > > it to you by next Monday. Our review period for the second review is > > finished today. > > > > As far as I know this is the only spec going to vote at Tokyo... because > of > > that I suggest we bump it to the front of the line. It is my understanding > > that other spec's qr is reviewing are not going to vote and they are > merely > > reviewing them as courtesy review and are not the formal review necessary > > for the ebXML spec release process. If I get the spec to you next Monday, > > may I expect it back with comments on eob Thursday? > > > > thanks for the help.... Rik > > -- > regards > tim mcgrath > TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160 > phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 -- regards tim mcgrath TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
begin:vcard n:McGrath;Tim tel;pager:+61(0)299633829 tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228 tel;fax:+61(0)893352142 tel;work:+61(0)893352228 x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:tmcgrath@tedis.com.au x-mozilla-cpt:;-19376 fn:tim mcgrath end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC