Re: [FWD]Re: Datatype section

[Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>]

> Perhaps the decision has already been made, either formally, or by
> unspoken consensus, that ebXML needs to define these datatypes, even
> knowing that they will be transmitted as text

See the CEN/ISSS Workshop Agreement on "Datatyping for Electronic Data
Interchange"  (
(http://www.cenorm.be/isss/workshop/ec/Datatyping/datatypes-cwa2.doc) for
the reasons why we need to extend EDIs too-basic levels of datatyping.

Martin Bryan