RE: ebXML Core Components Submission Version 1.02

[James Whittle <james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk>]

Martin how can you make comments against documents which at present are in
the editing phase? I ask the question because as a result of QRT comments
the documents may well be changed significantly, placing your comments
between two versions.

Kind regards

James Whittle
E Business standards executive

Tel. No. 44 (0)20 7655 9022
Fax No. 44 (0)20 7681 2278


10 Maltravers Street, LONDON, WC2R 3BX.
www Address: www.e-centre.org.uk <http://www.e-centre.org.uk>  
e-mail james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk <mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk> 


Best business practice in a digital age.

Disclaimer Notice 

The above information is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any
use (including retransmission or copying) of this information by person(s)
or entity other than the intended recipient is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please would you
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The sender is
not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it
has been transmitted over a public network. Any views or opinions are solely
those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of e centreUK.
All third party rights are duly acknowledged. e centreUK  is the trade name
of the Association for Standards and Practices in Electronic Trade - EAN UK
Limited, and is registered in the United Kingdom (Registration Number
1256140). 

© 2000 All Rights Reserved

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Martin Bryan [mailto:mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com]
		Sent:	28 March 2001 08:46
		To:	Lisa Shreve; James Whittle; tmcgrath@tedis.com.au;
'Gait Boxman'; 'Becker, Thomas'; Mike Adcock; Sue Probert
		Cc:	ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org
		Subject:	Re: ebXML Core Components Submission Version
1.02

		The following comments apply to Version 1.02 of the EbXML
Convention -
		Naming Convention for Core Components:

		Lines 139-142
		The following sentence could usefully be added to Rule 5:
		"If two adjacent aggregates use the same word(s) at the
start of their
		ObjectClass name the word(s) should be retained only in the
name of the
		higher of the two aggregates."

		If you want an example for this you could add to the
existing example:
		"If the ObjectClass called "party.details" contains an
aggregate called
		"party identification.details" which contains an aggregate
called "party
		name.text" the word "party" would only be retained for the
uppermost
		(party.details) aggregate.

		Martin Bryan