Re: ebXML Core Components Submission Version 1.02

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>]

yes, james is correct.  these specifications should now be frozen.

i suggest martin's comments be held until the next public review period.


James Whittle wrote:

> Martin how can you make comments against documents which at present are in
> the editing phase? I ask the question because as a result of QRT comments
> the documents may well be changed significantly, placing your comments
> between two versions.
>
> Kind regards
>
> James Whittle
> E Business standards executive
>
> Tel. No. 44 (0)20 7655 9022
> Fax No. 44 (0)20 7681 2278
>
> 10 Maltravers Street, LONDON, WC2R 3BX.
> www Address: www.e-centre.org.uk <http://www.e-centre.org.uk>
> e-mail james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk <mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk>
>
> Best business practice in a digital age.
>
> Disclaimer Notice
>
> The above information is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which
> it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any
> use (including retransmission or copying) of this information by person(s)
> or entity other than the intended recipient is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please would you
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The sender is
> not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it
> has been transmitted over a public network. Any views or opinions are solely
> those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of e centreUK.
> All third party rights are duly acknowledged. e centreUK  is the trade name
> of the Association for Standards and Practices in Electronic Trade - EAN UK
> Limited, and is registered in the United Kingdom (Registration Number
> 1256140).
>
> © 2000 All Rights Reserved
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From:   Martin Bryan [mailto:mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com]
>                 Sent:   28 March 2001 08:46
>                 To:     Lisa Shreve; James Whittle; tmcgrath@tedis.com.au;
> 'Gait Boxman'; 'Becker, Thomas'; Mike Adcock; Sue Probert
>                 Cc:     ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org
>                 Subject:        Re: ebXML Core Components Submission Version
> 1.02
>
>                 The following comments apply to Version 1.02 of the EbXML
> Convention -
>                 Naming Convention for Core Components:
>
>                 Lines 139-142
>                 The following sentence could usefully be added to Rule 5:
>                 "If two adjacent aggregates use the same word(s) at the
> start of their
>                 ObjectClass name the word(s) should be retained only in the
> name of the
>                 higher of the two aggregates."
>
>                 If you want an example for this you could add to the
> existing example:
>                 "If the ObjectClass called "party.details" contains an
> aggregate called
>                 "party identification.details" which contains an aggregate
> called "party
>                 name.text" the word "party" would only be retained for the
> uppermost
>                 (party.details) aggregate.
>
>                 Martin Bryan

--
regards
tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142