Subject: Re: Just what is a Core Component? Or, when is stealing wrong?
David Welsh is "confident CC will log & answer to your request by Vienna," referring to my suggestion that UN/EDIFACT simply be modeled as the set of ebXML Core Components. I am not as confident, as David is, that this would happen, since identical requests have never been "logged and answered." This is not the first time the suggestion has been made: one brilliant wag wrote almost exactly a year ago to the day, in "Summary of XML Datatypes as required for B2B applications," at http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-core/200004/msg00001.html - But I do like the concept of semantic building blocks or core components. So why re-invent them from scratch? Just take a look at the EDIFACT directories and dictionaries, and all of the core components for ebXML can be effortlessly extracted. The silence then was deafening, and if a year was not enough time to seriously consider a sincere proposal, then two weeks to Vienna certainly doesn't leave enough time now. Instead, we are treated to the spectacle of the Core Components chair not quite sure whether a decision has been made to adopt xCBL - hook, line and sinker - as the end-result of 18 months of effort. William J. Kammerer FORESIGHT Corp. 4950 Blazer Pkwy. Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305 +1 614 791-1600 Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/ "accelerating time-to-trade"
Powered by eList eXpress LLC