RE: [ebxml-dev] BPMI?

[Sonnenglanz Consulting <lists@sonnenglanz.net>]

 

JJ Dubray participated in these discussions and contributed a chapter "Implementing BPSS" to the Wrox Book, "Professional ebXML Foundations", which discusses the relation between BPSS, BPML, XLANG and WSFL.  This also takes the view of BPSS being complementary to BPML.

Pim van der Eijk

-----Original Message-----
From: Rajesh_KumarT [mailto:Rajesh_KumarT@infy.com]
Sent: 22 February 2002 08:35
To: James Bryce Clark; ebxml-dev
Cc: bpmi-dev@bpmi.org
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] BPMI?
Importance: High

Hi,   

    Is there any kind of documentation/minutes available that gives the details of the cross-discussions held and what was the outcome of the discussions?

Would also be great to get pointers to the work being done in making all the available, related specifications interoperable.

 

regards,

Rajesh

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@mmiec.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:40 AM
To: ebxml-dev
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] BPMI?

At 06:43 PM 2/21/02, Rajesh_KumarT wrote:

* * * ebXML is more worried about "Business Process Collaboration" rather than "Describing the Business Process of an organization and integration with technical implementation" which is the concern of BPML. * * * BPML can be seen ( not in entirety ) as an evolution of EAI with lot more capabilities.

There were some useful cross-discussions about BPML and ebXML BP in the summer of 2001.  My impression from those was exactly the same as Rajesh's.  BPML is much closer to an EAI paradigm, albeit extendable across boundaries between trading partners.  ebXML is much more concerned with negotiated (versus centrally orchestrated) interactions between independent TPs who wish to synchronize, but without giving up control.

Regards  Jamie Clark

~ James Bryce Clark   
~ VP and General Counsel, McLure-Moynihan Inc.
~ Chair, ABA Business Law Subcommittee on Electronic Commerce  
~ 1 818 597 9475   jamie.clark@mmiec.com    jbc@lawyer.com
~ This message is neither legal advice nor a binding signature.  Ask me why.